A New York judge has denied Donald Trump’s request to dismiss his hush money conviction, rejecting arguments based on a recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. Manhattan Judge Juan Merchan, who oversaw Trump’s trial, upheld the 34 felony counts, stating they pertained to “unofficial conduct” and therefore were not covered by presidential immunity.
Trump’s Argument for Dismissal Rejected
Trump’s legal team argued that the case relied on evidence related to his official duties as president, seeking protection under a July Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution for “official actions” taken in office. However, Judge Merchan countered this argument in a 41-page ruling, emphasizing that the evidence presented at trial focused solely on “unofficial conduct.” He cited the Supreme Court’s own acknowledgment that presidential actions are not automatically considered “official” simply because they occur in the Oval Office.
Trump’s spokesman, Steven Cheung, criticized the judge’s decision, calling it a “direct violation” of the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling and demanding immediate dismissal of the “lawless case.”
Hush Money Conviction Details and Potential Implications
The conviction stems from Trump’s efforts to conceal reimbursements to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, who paid adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016 to keep silent about an alleged affair with Trump. Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing. The May conviction marked a historic event, potentially making Trump the first felon to occupy the White House if the conviction stands.
Next Steps and Uncertain Timeline
Judge Merchan’s decision was initially expected in November but was postponed pending guidance from prosecutors on proceeding with the case in light of Trump’s re-election. Trump subsequently filed another motion for dismissal, citing his return to the presidency as grounds for dismissal.
Following this latest ruling, Trump’s legal team is expected to pursue further delays and appeals. The timing of a potential sentence remains unclear, with Judge Merchan yet to determine whether sentencing will occur before Trump takes office in January, after his term concludes in 2029, or at all. The judge’s decision leaves significant questions unanswered regarding the legal and political ramifications of this unprecedented situation.
