How Much Money Is Spent Annually Enforcing Traffic Laws?

How Much Money Is Spent Annually Enforcing Traffic Laws? Enforcing traffic laws involves significant financial investment, and at money-central.com, we’re committed to providing clarity on where your tax dollars are going and the impacts on your finances. This financial commitment supports various activities from police patrols to court systems. In this guide, we’ll break down the costs and explore how these expenditures impact both state budgets and individual citizens, including the impact on public safety and traffic management.

1. What Are The Primary Costs Associated With Traffic Law Enforcement?

The primary costs associated with traffic law enforcement encompass a wide range of expenditures, impacting various aspects of the judicial and public safety systems. It includes salaries for law enforcement personnel, court operational costs, and investments in technology and infrastructure.

Law Enforcement Salaries and Benefits: A significant portion of the budget is allocated to paying the salaries and benefits of traffic police officers, state troopers, and other law enforcement personnel responsible for patrolling roads, conducting traffic stops, and issuing citations.
Court and Judicial Expenses: Enforcing traffic laws involves a substantial amount of court-related expenses. These include the salaries of judges, court staff, prosecutors, and public defenders, as well as the costs associated with court facilities, equipment, and administrative operations.
Technology and Equipment: Modern traffic law enforcement relies heavily on technology and equipment. This includes patrol vehicles, radar guns, lidar devices, in-car video systems, body-worn cameras, automated license plate readers (ALPRs), and software for data analysis and record-keeping.
Infrastructure and Maintenance: Maintaining roads, highways, and traffic signals is crucial for ensuring traffic safety and facilitating enforcement efforts. Costs include the installation and maintenance of traffic signs, signals, pavement markings, guardrails, and other infrastructure elements.
Training and Education: Law enforcement personnel require specialized training and ongoing education to stay up-to-date on traffic laws, enforcement techniques, and best practices. Budgets must account for the costs of training academies, workshops, seminars, and professional development programs.
Administrative and Support Services: A portion of the budget is allocated to administrative and support services that support traffic law enforcement efforts. This includes personnel for data entry, record management, dispatch operations, and public information.
Data Collection and Analysis: Law enforcement agencies invest in data collection and analysis to track traffic accidents, identify high-risk areas, and evaluate the effectiveness of enforcement strategies. Costs include software, hardware, and personnel for data analysis and reporting.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Many jurisdictions conduct public awareness campaigns to educate drivers about traffic laws, promote safe driving habits, and deter risky behavior. Costs include advertising, marketing materials, and outreach events.

Understanding these costs is crucial for assessing the financial impact of traffic law enforcement on government budgets and taxpayers. Efficient allocation of resources and evidence-based strategies can help optimize enforcement efforts and improve traffic safety outcomes.

2. How Much Do States Spend On Traffic Law Enforcement Annually?

States across the U.S. allocate significant financial resources to traffic law enforcement annually, but the exact figures vary considerably depending on factors such as population size, geographic area, traffic density, and enforcement priorities.

While it is challenging to pinpoint a precise nationwide total due to the decentralized nature of law enforcement funding and reporting, we can explore some available data and estimates to get a sense of the scale.

Traffic Light Stop

Example: New York State

According to the New York State Comptroller’s Office, state agencies spent hundreds of millions of dollars on traffic-related activities in recent years. For example, the New York State Police (NYSP) allocated approximately $471 million to patrol activities in 2022, a significant portion of which is dedicated to traffic enforcement.

Estimating Nationwide Spending

Given that New York is just one of 50 states, and considering the traffic-related expenditures of other state agencies and local law enforcement, it is reasonable to estimate that total spending on traffic law enforcement nationwide reaches into the billions of dollars annually.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provides federal funding to states for traffic safety programs, including enforcement initiatives. While these grants represent a portion of overall spending, they highlight the federal government’s commitment to supporting state-level enforcement efforts.

Factors Influencing Spending

Population and Traffic Density: Densely populated states with high traffic volumes typically require greater investment in traffic law enforcement to manage congestion, prevent accidents, and ensure public safety.
Enforcement Priorities: States may prioritize certain traffic violations, such as impaired driving, speeding, or distracted driving, leading to targeted enforcement campaigns and increased spending in those areas.
Technology Adoption: States that invest in advanced technologies, such as automated license plate readers (ALPRs) or data analytics systems, may incur higher upfront costs but potentially achieve greater efficiency in enforcement efforts.

Understanding the magnitude of state spending on traffic law enforcement is essential for policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and the public. It informs discussions about resource allocation, enforcement strategies, and the overall effectiveness of efforts to improve traffic safety.

3. What Percentage Of State Budgets Is Allocated To Traffic Enforcement?

The percentage of state budgets allocated to traffic enforcement varies from state to state, influenced by factors such as population size, traffic volume, enforcement priorities, and overall budgetary constraints. While it is challenging to provide a precise figure applicable to all states, we can examine some available data and insights to understand the typical range.

General Budget Allocation

In general, state budgets are divided among various categories, including education, healthcare, public safety, transportation, and general government services. Traffic enforcement typically falls under the broader category of public safety, which also includes law enforcement, corrections, and emergency services.

Within the public safety budget, traffic enforcement competes for resources with other essential functions. The specific allocation to traffic enforcement depends on the state’s priorities and its assessment of the risks and benefits associated with different enforcement strategies.

Estimating the Percentage

Based on available data and reports, traffic enforcement typically accounts for a relatively small percentage of overall state budgets, often ranging from 1% to 5%. However, this figure can vary significantly depending on the state and its specific circumstances.

Factors Influencing Allocation

State Priorities: States that prioritize traffic safety and invest heavily in law enforcement may allocate a higher percentage of their budgets to traffic enforcement.
Traffic Volume and Congestion: States with high traffic volumes and significant congestion may require more extensive enforcement efforts to manage traffic flow and prevent accidents.
Crime Rates: States facing high crime rates may prioritize other areas of law enforcement, such as violent crime reduction, potentially leading to a smaller allocation for traffic enforcement.

It’s important to note that the percentage of state budgets allocated to traffic enforcement can fluctuate from year to year due to changing priorities, economic conditions, and legislative decisions. Monitoring these trends and understanding the factors that influence budget allocations can help inform discussions about resource allocation and policy decisions related to traffic safety.

4. How Does Traffic Law Enforcement Funding Affect Local Communities?

Traffic law enforcement funding has a significant impact on local communities, affecting public safety, community relations, and municipal budgets. Here’s how:

Enhanced Public Safety: Adequate funding for traffic law enforcement enables local police departments and sheriff’s offices to conduct patrols, enforce traffic laws, and respond to accidents, thereby enhancing public safety on local roads and highways.
Reduced Traffic Accidents: Proactive traffic enforcement can deter speeding, impaired driving, and other risky behaviors that contribute to traffic accidents. By reducing the frequency and severity of accidents, traffic law enforcement funding helps prevent injuries, fatalities, and property damage in local communities.
Improved Traffic Flow: Effective traffic management and enforcement can help alleviate congestion, improve traffic flow, and reduce travel times on local roads. This benefits commuters, businesses, and residents by making it easier to navigate the community and conduct daily activities.
Revenue Generation: Traffic fines and penalties collected through enforcement activities can generate revenue for local governments, which can be used to fund various municipal services, such as road maintenance, infrastructure improvements, and public safety initiatives.
Community Relations: The way in which traffic laws are enforced can have a profound impact on community relations. Fair, impartial, and respectful enforcement practices can foster trust and cooperation between law enforcement and community members. Conversely, aggressive or discriminatory enforcement tactics can erode trust and create tensions.
Resource Allocation: Traffic law enforcement competes for resources with other essential local government services, such as education, healthcare, and social services. Decisions about funding levels for traffic enforcement can impact the availability and quality of these other services.
Economic Development: Safe and efficient transportation infrastructure is essential for economic development in local communities. Traffic law enforcement funding can support efforts to improve road safety, reduce congestion, and enhance mobility, thereby attracting businesses, investment, and jobs.
Quality of Life: Traffic law enforcement contributes to the overall quality of life in local communities by reducing traffic accidents, improving traffic flow, and promoting safe driving habits. This creates a safer, more livable environment for residents.

Local communities must carefully consider the benefits and costs of traffic law enforcement funding to ensure that resources are allocated effectively and that enforcement practices are fair, equitable, and aligned with community values.

5. What Are Some Of The Less Obvious Expenses Related To Traffic Law Enforcement?

Beyond the direct costs of salaries, equipment, and court operations, there are several less obvious expenses associated with traffic law enforcement that can significantly impact government budgets and local communities.

Healthcare Costs: Traffic accidents resulting from traffic violations can lead to injuries, disabilities, and fatalities, which incur significant healthcare costs. These costs are borne by individuals, insurance companies, and government-funded healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
Lost Productivity: Traffic accidents can cause traffic delays, disruptions, and lost productivity for commuters, businesses, and emergency services. These delays can result in lost wages, missed appointments, and reduced economic output.
Insurance Premiums: Traffic violations and accidents can lead to increased insurance premiums for drivers, particularly those with a history of moving violations or at-fault accidents. These higher premiums can strain household budgets and disproportionately affect low-income individuals.
Legal Fees: Individuals who receive traffic tickets or are involved in traffic accidents may incur legal fees to contest the charges, negotiate settlements, or pursue legal action. These fees can add to the financial burden of traffic law enforcement.
Vehicle Damage and Repairs: Traffic accidents can cause damage to vehicles, requiring repairs, replacements, and insurance claims. These costs can be substantial, particularly for severe accidents involving multiple vehicles or extensive damage.
Administrative Overhead: Traffic law enforcement generates administrative overhead for government agencies, including the costs of processing tickets, maintaining records, managing data, and responding to inquiries.
Training and Certification: Law enforcement personnel require specialized training and certification to operate equipment, conduct investigations, and enforce traffic laws. These training programs incur costs for instructors, facilities, and materials.
Infrastructure Damage: Traffic accidents can cause damage to roads, bridges, traffic signals, and other infrastructure elements, requiring repairs and replacements. These costs are typically borne by government agencies and taxpayers.
Social Costs: Traffic accidents and fatalities can have broader social costs, including grief, trauma, and reduced quality of life for victims, families, and communities. These social costs are difficult to quantify but represent a significant impact of traffic law enforcement.

Understanding these less obvious expenses is essential for assessing the full economic and social impact of traffic law enforcement. By considering these costs in policy decisions and resource allocation, governments can make more informed choices that promote traffic safety and minimize the burden on individuals and communities.

6. Are There Studies Documenting The Costs Of Traffic Law Enforcement?

Yes, several studies have documented the costs of traffic law enforcement, providing valuable insights into the economic impact of enforcement activities and their effectiveness in improving traffic safety. Here are some notable examples:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): NHTSA conducts and sponsors research on various aspects of traffic safety, including the costs of traffic accidents, the effectiveness of enforcement strategies, and the economic benefits of reducing traffic fatalities and injuries.
AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety: The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety conducts research on a wide range of traffic safety issues, including the costs of traffic crashes, the impact of distracted driving, and the effectiveness of safety interventions.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS): IIHS conducts research and publishes reports on vehicle safety, crashworthiness, and the effectiveness of traffic safety laws and regulations. Their research often includes economic analyses of the costs and benefits of different safety interventions.
University Transportation Centers (UTCs): The U.S. Department of Transportation funds University Transportation Centers across the country to conduct research on transportation-related topics, including traffic safety, infrastructure, and policy.
State Departments of Transportation (DOTs): Many state DOTs conduct studies and analyses of traffic safety issues within their jurisdictions, including the costs of traffic accidents, the effectiveness of enforcement programs, and the economic impact of transportation investments.
Academic Institutions: Researchers at universities and colleges conduct studies on various aspects of traffic safety, including the economics of traffic law enforcement, the impact of traffic violations on insurance rates, and the social costs of traffic accidents.
Government Accountability Office (GAO): GAO conducts audits and evaluations of government programs and agencies, including those related to traffic safety. Their reports often include assessments of the costs and benefits of different enforcement strategies.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA): A division of NHTSA, NCSA is the source for data on traffic crashes. NCSA also funds research and analysis that yields a more complete understanding of highway safety issues.

These studies and reports provide valuable data and insights for policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and researchers seeking to understand the costs of traffic law enforcement and evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for improving traffic safety.

7. How Has The Funding For Traffic Law Enforcement Changed Over Time?

The funding for traffic law enforcement has changed over time, influenced by various factors such as economic conditions, policy priorities, and evolving traffic safety challenges. Understanding these trends can provide insights into the changing landscape of traffic law enforcement and its impact on communities.

Economic Conditions: Economic recessions or downturns can lead to budget cuts and reduced funding for traffic law enforcement, as governments prioritize essential services and reduce discretionary spending. Conversely, periods of economic growth can result in increased funding for traffic law enforcement, as governments have more resources to invest in public safety initiatives.
Policy Priorities: Shifts in policy priorities can also affect funding for traffic law enforcement. For example, increased emphasis on combating impaired driving or distracted driving may lead to increased funding for targeted enforcement campaigns and public awareness programs.
Federal Funding: Federal grants and funding programs, such as those administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), play a significant role in supporting state and local traffic law enforcement efforts. Changes in federal funding levels can have a ripple effect on state and local budgets for traffic enforcement.
Technological Advancements: Investments in new technologies, such as automated license plate readers (ALPRs), in-car video systems, and data analytics platforms, can impact funding for traffic law enforcement. These technologies may require upfront investments but can also improve efficiency and effectiveness over time.
Traffic Safety Trends: Changes in traffic safety trends, such as increases in traffic fatalities or injuries, can prompt increased funding for traffic law enforcement, as governments seek to address emerging safety challenges and reduce the incidence of accidents.
Public Pressure: Public pressure and advocacy from community groups, safety organizations, and victims’ families can influence funding decisions for traffic law enforcement. Increased public awareness of traffic safety issues can lead to greater support for enforcement efforts and increased funding allocations.
Legislative Action: Legislative action at the state and federal levels can impact funding for traffic law enforcement. For example, new laws or regulations related to traffic safety may require increased funding for enforcement and implementation.
Demographic Changes: Demographic changes, such as population growth or shifts in age distribution, can affect traffic patterns and safety risks, potentially leading to adjustments in funding for traffic law enforcement to address changing needs.

Tracking these trends and understanding the factors that influence funding for traffic law enforcement can help policymakers and stakeholders make informed decisions about resource allocation and policy priorities to improve traffic safety and protect communities.

8. How Does The Effectiveness Of Traffic Law Enforcement Relate To Its Funding?

The effectiveness of traffic law enforcement is closely related to its funding levels, although the relationship is complex and influenced by various factors. Adequate funding is essential for providing law enforcement agencies with the resources they need to effectively enforce traffic laws and improve traffic safety. However, simply increasing funding does not guarantee improved outcomes, and other factors such as enforcement strategies, training, technology, and community engagement play crucial roles.

Resource Availability: Adequate funding enables law enforcement agencies to hire and train qualified officers, purchase and maintain equipment, and deploy resources effectively. Insufficient funding can lead to staffing shortages, outdated equipment, and limited enforcement capacity, which can hinder efforts to deter traffic violations and reduce accidents.
Enforcement Strategies: The effectiveness of traffic law enforcement depends on the strategies and tactics used by law enforcement agencies. Evidence-based strategies, such as high-visibility patrols, targeted enforcement campaigns, and sobriety checkpoints, can be highly effective in deterring traffic violations and reducing accidents. However, these strategies require adequate funding to implement and sustain.
Training and Education: Proper training and education are essential for law enforcement officers to effectively enforce traffic laws, investigate accidents, and interact with the public. Adequate funding allows agencies to provide officers with specialized training in areas such as traffic law, accident investigation, and community policing.
Technology: Advanced technologies, such as automated license plate readers (ALPRs), in-car video systems, and data analytics platforms, can enhance the effectiveness of traffic law enforcement by improving efficiency, accuracy, and accountability. However, these technologies require upfront investments and ongoing maintenance, which can strain budgets if funding is insufficient.
Community Engagement: Community engagement and collaboration are essential for building trust and cooperation between law enforcement and the public. Adequate funding allows agencies to invest in community policing initiatives, public awareness campaigns, and partnerships with community organizations to promote traffic safety and improve community relations.
Data Analysis: Data analysis is crucial for identifying traffic safety problems, evaluating the effectiveness of enforcement strategies, and allocating resources efficiently. Adequate funding allows agencies to invest in data analytics platforms and personnel to collect, analyze, and interpret traffic data.
Accountability: Accountability and oversight are essential for ensuring that traffic law enforcement is conducted fairly, impartially, and effectively. Adequate funding allows agencies to implement internal controls, conduct audits, and respond to complaints to maintain accountability and transparency.

The relationship between funding and effectiveness in traffic law enforcement is not always linear, and other factors such as leadership, management, and organizational culture can also play significant roles. However, adequate funding is a necessary condition for effective traffic law enforcement, and strategic investments in resources, training, technology, and community engagement can help maximize the impact of enforcement efforts on traffic safety.

9. What Are The Alternatives To Traditional Traffic Law Enforcement That Could Be More Cost-Effective?

While traditional traffic law enforcement plays a crucial role in promoting traffic safety, there are alternative approaches that could be more cost-effective and efficient in achieving desired outcomes. These alternatives often focus on prevention, education, and technology, aiming to reduce traffic violations and accidents without relying solely on enforcement actions.

Automated Enforcement: Automated enforcement systems, such as red-light cameras and speed cameras, can automatically detect and ticket traffic violations, reducing the need for police officers to conduct traffic stops. These systems can be cost-effective in terms of manpower and can also improve safety by deterring risky behavior.
Traffic Engineering and Infrastructure Improvements: Improving road design, traffic signals, and signage can enhance safety and reduce the likelihood of accidents. For example, roundabouts, median barriers, and rumble strips can help prevent crashes and reduce the severity of injuries.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating the public about traffic safety issues, such as the dangers of impaired driving, distracted driving, and speeding, can help change behavior and reduce the incidence of traffic violations. Public awareness campaigns can be cost-effective in reaching large audiences and promoting safe driving habits.
Driver Education and Training: Comprehensive driver education and training programs can help new drivers develop the skills and knowledge they need to operate vehicles safely. These programs can also provide refresher courses for experienced drivers to improve their driving skills and awareness.
Incentive Programs: Incentive programs, such as safe driver rewards and insurance discounts, can motivate drivers to adopt safe driving habits and avoid traffic violations. These programs can be cost-effective in promoting safe behavior and reducing the risk of accidents.
Data-Driven Strategies: Using data analytics to identify high-risk areas, target enforcement efforts, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions can help optimize resource allocation and improve outcomes. Data-driven strategies can be more efficient and effective than traditional approaches that rely on intuition or guesswork.
Community Engagement: Engaging with community members and stakeholders to identify traffic safety problems and develop solutions can help build support for enforcement efforts and promote a culture of safety. Community engagement can be cost-effective in fostering collaboration and leveraging local knowledge and resources.
Technology-Based Solutions: Utilizing technology-based solutions, such as smartphone apps and in-vehicle systems, to promote safe driving habits can be cost-effective in reaching drivers and providing real-time feedback. For example, apps that monitor driving behavior and provide alerts for speeding or distracted driving can help drivers improve their skills and awareness.
Restorative Justice: In some cases, restorative justice approaches can be used to address traffic violations, focusing on repairing harm and promoting accountability rather than simply punishing offenders. Restorative justice can be cost-effective in reducing recidivism and promoting community healing.

By exploring these alternatives and adopting a comprehensive approach to traffic safety, governments can potentially reduce the costs of traffic law enforcement while still achieving desired outcomes in terms of safety, efficiency, and community well-being.

10. What Is The Future Of Traffic Law Enforcement Funding?

The future of traffic law enforcement funding is likely to be shaped by several key trends and factors, including technological advancements, evolving traffic safety challenges, and changing societal priorities.

Technological Integration: Technology will continue to play an increasingly important role in traffic law enforcement, with investments in automated enforcement systems, data analytics platforms, and advanced sensor technologies. Funding will likely be directed towards acquiring and implementing these technologies to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Data-Driven Strategies: Data-driven approaches to traffic law enforcement will become more prevalent, with agencies relying on data analytics to identify high-risk areas, target enforcement efforts, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Funding will be allocated to data collection, analysis, and reporting to support evidence-based decision-making.
Emphasis on Prevention: There will be a greater emphasis on prevention strategies, such as public awareness campaigns, driver education programs, and infrastructure improvements, to reduce traffic violations and accidents before they occur. Funding will be directed towards these preventive measures to complement traditional enforcement efforts.
Focus on Equity: Traffic law enforcement agencies will face increasing scrutiny regarding issues of equity and fairness, with growing calls for reforms to address racial bias and disparities in enforcement practices. Funding may be allocated to training programs, community engagement initiatives, and data analysis efforts to promote equitable enforcement outcomes.
Alternative Funding Models: Traditional funding models for traffic law enforcement may be supplemented by alternative approaches, such as user fees, dedicated taxes, or public-private partnerships, to ensure sustainable funding for traffic safety initiatives. These alternative funding models may be necessary to address budget constraints and evolving priorities.
Increased Collaboration: Collaboration between law enforcement agencies, transportation agencies, and community organizations will become more important in addressing traffic safety challenges. Funding may be directed towards collaborative initiatives that leverage the expertise and resources of multiple stakeholders.
Adaptation to Emerging Challenges: Traffic law enforcement agencies will need to adapt to emerging challenges, such as the proliferation of autonomous vehicles, the rise of e-scooters and other micromobility devices, and the increasing complexity of traffic regulations. Funding will be allocated to research, training, and technology to address these challenges effectively.
Performance Measurement: Performance measurement and accountability will become more important in evaluating the effectiveness of traffic law enforcement efforts and justifying funding allocations. Agencies will be expected to demonstrate measurable outcomes, such as reductions in traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities, to secure continued funding support.

Overall, the future of traffic law enforcement funding is likely to be characterized by a shift towards more strategic, data-driven, and prevention-oriented approaches, with a focus on leveraging technology, promoting equity, and fostering collaboration to improve traffic safety and enhance community well-being.

Visit money-central.com today to explore our comprehensive articles, use our financial tools, and seek expert advice tailored to your unique financial situation in the USA. Contact us at Address: 44 West Fourth Street, New York, NY 10012, United States. Phone: +1 (212) 998-0000. Let money-central.com be your guide to financial empowerment and success.

FAQ: Traffic Law Enforcement Spending

1. How much money is spent annually enforcing traffic laws in the U.S.?

It is estimated that billions of dollars are spent annually on traffic law enforcement in the U.S. This includes costs for law enforcement salaries, court expenses, and technology.

2. What are the major expenses in traffic law enforcement?

The major expenses include law enforcement salaries and benefits, court and judicial expenses, technology and equipment, infrastructure maintenance, and training and education.

3. How does traffic law enforcement funding affect local communities?

Funding for traffic law enforcement enhances public safety, reduces traffic accidents, improves traffic flow, and generates revenue for local governments. It also affects community relations and resource allocation.

4. What percentage of state budgets is typically allocated to traffic enforcement?

Typically, 1% to 5% of state budgets is allocated to traffic enforcement. This varies depending on the state’s priorities, traffic volume, and crime rates.

5. What are some less obvious expenses related to traffic law enforcement?

Less obvious expenses include healthcare costs from accidents, lost productivity due to traffic delays, increased insurance premiums, legal fees, vehicle damage, and administrative overhead.

6. Are there studies documenting the costs of traffic law enforcement?

Yes, organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) have conducted studies.

7. How has funding for traffic law enforcement changed over time?

Funding has changed due to economic conditions, policy priorities, federal funding, technological advancements, and traffic safety trends.

8. How does the effectiveness of traffic law enforcement relate to its funding?

Effectiveness is closely related to funding levels. Adequate funding provides resources for qualified officers, proper training, and advanced technology, all of which enhance enforcement effectiveness.

9. What are some cost-effective alternatives to traditional traffic law enforcement?

Alternatives include automated enforcement, traffic engineering improvements, public awareness campaigns, and technology-based solutions.

10. What is the future of traffic law enforcement funding?

The future includes greater integration of technology, data-driven strategies, increased emphasis on prevention, a focus on equity, and alternative funding models.