Risk, in its starkest form, can be measured by the absence of basic necessities. Vladimir Lenin’s grim observation, “every society is three meals away from chaos,” and Britain’s MI5’s assessment that society is “four meals away from anarchy,” highlight a fundamental truth: food security is the bedrock of social stability. When this foundation crumbles, particularly after natural disasters, communities become vulnerable to manipulation. This vulnerability opens doors for foreign influence operations, where state actors exploit desperation for their geopolitical gains. However, a powerful countermeasure exists, one that speaks directly to the heart of the issue: money.
It’s a simple equation: hungry people are susceptible to influence; fed people are not. Parametric insurance emerges as a potent financial tool to ensure populations are fed after disasters, effectively diminishing the leverage of state actors seeking to exploit crises. This innovative risk-transfer mechanism, already utilized by developing nations for natural disaster protection, offers a pre-arranged influx of capital, requiring a comparatively small upfront investment. This leverage is particularly amplified when engaging the private insurance market.
By establishing a system that provides financial coverage to vulnerable states, enabling swift claim payments to those affected, the United States and its allies can proactively utilize a humanitarian-focused economic security approach. This strategy effectively denies state influence peddlers the very foothold they seek in disaster-stricken regions. This solution is not theoretical; it’s practical, scalable, cost-effective, and has a proven track record in the global south.
.JPG?ver=2017-08-02-151306-857)
US military personnel unloading aid supplies from a CH-47 Chinook helicopter during a disaster relief operation in Haiti, illustrating the logistical challenges and immediate needs following natural disasters where financial solutions can enable faster and more effective aid distribution, countering potential exploitation by state actors.
Influence Operations: A Growing Threat Landscape
Influence operations, as defined in a comprehensive 2009 RAND report, are the “coordinated, integrated, and synchronized application of national diplomatic, informational, military, economic, and other capabilities… to foster attitudes, behaviors, or decisions by foreign target audiences” in furtherance of national interests. While the concept is ancient, dating back to smear campaigns in antiquity, the digital age has amplified its reach exponentially. With billions of interconnected devices and online users, the scale and scope of modern influence operations are unprecedented.
Quantifying the impact of state-sponsored influence campaigns remains a complex challenge. These operations often aim to sow discord, marginalize segments of the population, or erode trust in institutions. Even sporadic successes can yield significant results for state actors at a relatively low cost. A reactive approach to these campaigns is insufficient to stem the rising tide of malicious influence, particularly in the aftermath of natural disasters, as highlighted by experts like Malzac.
The increasing frequency of natural disasters, exacerbated by climate change, creates a fertile ground for disinformation and influence. Climate change itself has become a subject of foreign influence, further complicating the landscape. The aftermath of events like the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake in Türkiye and the Hawaii wildfires saw immediate accusations and disinformation campaigns, ranging from claims of “tectonic weapons” to “directed energy weapons.”
Post-disaster influence operations are most effective when targeting vulnerable populations already harboring grievances. Rumors surrounding Hurricanes Helene and Milton, falsely blaming the US government for weaponizing weather technology to target political opponents, illustrate how readily disinformation can spread among a disaffected populace. When people are predisposed to distrust their government, they are more likely to embrace narratives that align with their existing beliefs, regardless of factual accuracy.
While combating online misinformation appears daunting, a surprisingly straightforward and historically proven solution exists: parametric insurance. This financial tool offers a proactive and effective strategy to mitigate the conditions that make populations susceptible to influence operations.
Parametric Insurance: A Financial Shield Against Influence
Parametric insurance is a revolutionary approach to risk management. Unlike traditional indemnity insurance, it doesn’t rely on assessing actual losses. Instead, payouts are triggered by pre-defined event parameters – such as the magnitude of an earthquake, the category of a hurricane, or the severity of a drought. If these parameters are met, the insurance pays out a pre-agreed sum, regardless of the precise damage incurred. This mechanism is particularly well-suited for developing markets across Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, and is increasingly used in developed economies to supplement traditional insurance coverage.
Consider earthquake insurance in Istanbul as an example. A parametric policy would define a geographical “box” encompassing the region and specify a trigger magnitude, say 7.0Mw. If an earthquake of that magnitude or greater occurs within the defined area, the policy is automatically triggered, and payment is disbursed swiftly. This checklist-based system ensures transparency, reduces disputes, and accelerates aid delivery when it’s most needed.
Governments are increasingly recognizing the value of parametric insurance. Nations like Jamaica, Mexico, and Chile, along with numerous African catastrophe programs, have adopted it for its simplicity, objectivity, and speed of payout. The reliance on independent third-party data for trigger events eliminates the potential for manipulation and ensures impartial assessments. The rapid disbursement of funds is crucial in the immediate aftermath of a disaster, enabling swift response and recovery efforts.
A key advantage of parametric insurance over traditional foreign aid is its scalability and cost-effectiveness. Donor states can achieve significant leverage by paying only the insurance premium, a fraction of the potential payout. For instance, a $5-10 million premium could secure $100 million in coverage. In the event of a triggering event, the substantial payout comes from the private insurance market, which possesses the financial capacity to handle large-scale disaster claims, as evidenced by the nearly $100 billion paid out by insurers for natural disasters in 2023 alone.
While parametric insurance is not a novel concept, its application as a tool to counter foreign influence is groundbreaking. The droughts in Moldova provide a compelling case study to illustrate its potential.
Moldova: A Case Study in Counter-Influence Finance
Moldova, grappling with disinformation, influence operations, drought vulnerability, and economic insecurity, presents an ideal test case for parametric insurance as a counter-influence strategy. Agriculture is a cornerstone of the Moldovan economy, contributing significantly to its GDP, employment, and land use. In Gagauzia, a semi-autonomous region with strained relations with the central government, agriculture constitutes a dominant 72% of the regional GDP. Threats to this sector have profound consequences for both Gagauzia and Moldova as a whole.
Compounding these economic vulnerabilities is Moldova’s complex geopolitical landscape. While Moldova seeks closer ties with the European Union, Gagauzia and Transnistria, another semi-autonomous region, maintain eastward orientations towards Moscow, fueled by historical factors, Russo-nostalgia, and skepticism towards the Moldovan-Romanian majority. This internal division creates fertile ground for foreign influence operations, with populations like the Gagauz receptive to sympathetic messaging from external actors.
The delicate balance in Moldova was severely tested in 2022 by a devastating drought, a recurring risk for the nation, projected to intensify with climate change. The drought crippled Moldova’s agricultural sector, causing an 18% contraction in a year already burdened by energy insecurity and the ripple effects of the war in Ukraine. In Gagauzia, the drought coincided with a surge in foreign influence operations. Exploiting the drought’s economic impact and pre-existing grievances, Moldova, particularly Gagauzia, faced a barrage of foreign influence, much of it welcomed by the local population. Messaging amplified drought-related anxieties, intertwined with energy and economic woes, and even encouraged protests.
Russian influence in Moldova is deeply rooted and multifaceted. However, the drought of 2022 starkly demonstrated how economic anxieties, exacerbated by natural disasters, become direct conduits for influence operations. While no single solution can fully neutralize foreign influence, addressing the economic vulnerabilities exposed by disasters is a crucial step.
Parametric insurance offers a powerful tool to bolster economic security in regions like Gagauzia and across Moldova, directly mitigating a key vulnerability exploited by influence actors.
Implementation and Scalability: A Global Strategy
The 2024 drought in Moldova, mirroring the crisis of 2022, underscores the urgency and relevance of parametric insurance solutions for its agricultural sector, including Gagauzia. The objective is clear: to provide rapid, predictable financial support to farmers, addressing immediate economic security concerns and thereby diminishing the effectiveness of foreign influence operations. The Moldovan government’s allocation of 100 million Moldovan lei ($5.74 million) in drought relief, with specific thresholds for crop loss and farmer benefits, inadvertently mirrors the structure of a parametric insurance program.
This existing framework significantly simplifies the implementation of a parametric insurance scheme. The Moldovan government has essentially defined the parameters and triggers. The next step involves expanding the scope of coverage and securing donor funding to finance the insurance premiums through the private market. This is a readily achievable step.
Crucially, framing the intervention as insurance, rather than traditional aid, dramatically amplifies the impact of the allocated funds. The $5.7 million earmarked for drought relief could instead serve as an insurance premium, potentially unlocking 5 to 10 times greater financial protection through a parametric policy. This enhanced leverage makes securing donor commitments far more attractive, given the disproportionate impact relative to the premium investment.
The cost of significantly weakening foreign influence in Moldova could be as low as $5.7 million – a remarkably cost-effective starting point.
Beyond Moldova: A World Majority Approach
While supporting Moldova through parametric insurance is a strategically vital step, its true potential lies in its scalability as a global solution to counter post-disaster foreign influence operations. The principles and mechanisms successfully applied in Moldova are readily transferable, as demonstrated by the existing adoption of parametric insurance by governments across Latin America, the Caribbean, and Africa. Following successful implementation in Moldova, a broader global rollout is the logical next step. The compelling economics and the humanitarian co-benefits – providing essential aid to disaster victims – make parametric insurance an undeniable opportunity.
Parametric insurance is most effective under specific conditions. Firstly, the target state must face significant natural disaster risk. Secondly, this risk should be readily measurable, which is increasingly the case with advancements in data and technology, enabling parametric solutions for a wide range of perils, including wildfire, drought, and extreme weather. Thirdly, priority should be given to communities highly vulnerable to influence campaigns capable of swaying public sentiment. While larger, more resilient nations may absorb such efforts, smaller, economically fragile countries are far more susceptible.
A strategic focus for a parametric counter-influence program could align with what Russian President Vladimir Putin terms the “World Majority” – encompassing Asian, Middle Eastern, African, and Latin American nations, identified as a foreign policy priority for Russia. These regions are experiencing a rise in anti-US and anti-western sentiment, trends that could be reversed by proactive financial interventions. If parametric insurance can ensure food security and economic stability after disasters, it can effectively contribute to global stability and peace, ensuring that when money talks, it drowns out the disruptive narratives of state influence actors.
Tom Johansmeyer is a PhD candidate in international conflict analysis at the University of Kent, Canterbury. He is researching the cyber insurance protection gap as an economic security problem and is also a reinsurance broker in Bermuda, focusing on alternative forms of risk transfer in developing markets for emerging risks.
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official position of the Irregular Warfare Initiative, Princeton University’s Empirical Studies of Conflict Project, the Modern War Institute at West Point, or the United States Government.
Main Image: US service members stack boxes of aid while off-loading a US Army CH-47 Chinook during an aid relief mission on October 14, 2016 in Anse d’Hainault, Haiti. (US Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Paul Labbe)
If you value reading the Irregular Warfare Initiative, please consider supporting our work. And for the best gear, check out the IWI store for mugs, coasters, apparel, and other items.
